|
|
|
|
|
|
by lelanthran
58 days ago
|
|
|
> The same logic applies to your statement: >> Do that enough and you won't know enough about your codebase to recognise errors in the LLM output. > Okay, when that happens, then sure, you'll have a problem. It's not exactly the same: how will you know that you are missing errors due to lack of knowledge? > I now generate 90% of the code with LLM and I see no issues so far. Well, that's my point, innit? "I see no errors" is exactly the same outcome from "missing the errors that are generated". |
|
|