|
|
|
|
|
by drekipus
58 days ago
|
|
> If that was the case, code completion and templating would have been a revolutionary, world changing development in the field. And yet this is "AI is world changing, look at how fast it can change code!" > So while you still try to navigate through files, others already have features out. Your argument is "it can also read code faster too" - but it doesn't have the same tacit knowledge within the codebase. Documentation and comments can be wrong sometimes. Names are poorly chosen That's the thing about reviews: the implementor doesn't know what's needed for the feature, but the reviewer now needs to. The latter can't trust the former anymore. /Explain is constantly wrong.
/Plan is constantly over engineered.
/Tests are constantly fragile The only benefit AI has produced to existing codebase is now people care a lot more about getting documentation right and adding little snippet/how-tos called "skills" or whatever. |
|