[lcnPylGDnU4H9OF]

Right, but in this context the license plate number is still personal information, just of a different person.

[kube-system]

The CCPA explictly says:

> “Personal information” does not include [...] Information that a business has a reasonable basis to believe is lawfully made available to the general public by the consumer

[tptacek]

California has an entire statute regulating ALPR information, so we don't need to derive this axiomatically.

[kube-system]

One generally has to follow all of the laws, so evaluating what the CCPA says here is relevant for evaluating CCPA compliance.

[uoaei]

Yes, all the laws, including the ond GP is referring to.

[uoaei]

Then the key aspect of our discussion is the "identifiable" part, which you've left out.

[lcnPylGDnU4H9OF]

Are you now saying that one cannot possibly "identify" the "person" who owns a vehicle, solely with the "information" on a license plate?

[ndsipa_pomu]

You may be confused, but the owner of a vehicle is not necessarily the same as the driver of a vehicle. Recording a vehicle's license plate does not necessarily identify the driver unless they also happen to be the owner. (c.f. vehicle hiring companies)