|
|
|
|
|
by kasey_junk
67 days ago
|
|
GitHub had a business model where public repos were free. BitBucket didn’t. That’s it. That’s why git won, you could put up open source libs with one for free and not the other. Which is extra funny as the centralized service was the most important part of decentralized version control. |
|
So git /did/ have something better than Mercurial after all, it was a 3rd party, but it still meant that it was massively better than Mercurial.