[yabutlivnWoods]

We can define a Dyson Sphere in math.

We cannot build one.

AI outputting axiomatically valid syntax isn't going to be all that useful. It's possible to generate all axiomatically correct math with a for loop until the machine OOMs

Physics is not math and math is not physics.

[djsjajah]

You just failed the Turing test.

[goatlover]

The Turing test just failed you. I'll go one better, physics isn't reality, it's a model of reality utilizing math.

[dugidugout]

And I'll go one better, you haven't said anything here at all, you've just left a representation of what you understand to be saying.

[johnthescott]

we only perceive the past.

[keyle]

Maybe he passed the Turing test with 88.2% which is 1.8% higher than the competition.

[yabutlivnWoods]

Fortunately for me equivalents to Turing exist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_machine_equivalents

[djsjajah]

I don't follow. Can you explain how your comment is relevant to mine? It might help if you also explain how you interpreted my comment.