[amarant]

There's really only one thing we need to do to avoid the apocalypse, and that is to not hand over the launch codes to a LLM.

Seems easy enough, I'm actually pretty confident in even the most incompetent of current world leaders in this particular task.

[anon35]

You don't think a human using an LLM to generate content that convinces another human to press the launch button is a concern? Sure seems like there's more than one thing we need to do.

[mossTechnician]

The exact same concern already existed without LLMs. It is called social engineering, and has been a known risk for a while.

[amarant]

Honestly? I really don't! What kind of content do you think would trigger that? If humans were launching nukes based on Facebook posts we'd all be long dead! A good deep fake might trick your grandma, but it's not very likely to fool military intelligence.

[munificent]

> What kind of content do you think would trigger that?

The kind of political propaganda that leads to the US reelecting a convicted rapist whose selects another rapist to lead the Department of Defense who then renames it to the Department of War and, true to the name, starts unilaterally attacking other countries.

[amarant]

If trump getting elected was due to AI, I wonder why every nation isn't electing similarly awful politicians? Hungary just elected a new president who seems a lot better than his predecessor, and a lot better than trump. The Canadian prime minister is genuinely one of the best politicians I've seen in my lifetime! The list goes on and on.

No blaming trump on anything other than the people who voted for him is like blaming school shootings on anything other than guns:a popular American passtime, and complete and utter nonsense.

[intended]

Bear with me this digression into freedom of speech, before addressing your point.

The utilitarian argument for freedom of speech and expression in America finds its roots in the Marketplace of ideas.

Verification is frankly, the task of all our markets - to set up incentives for being right.

With no government interference in the exchange of ideas, citizens would be better able to discuss ideas, including those not popular with the establishment.

Since no one has a monopoly on truth, it would be through this competition, and fair traffic society would be better able to understand truth and thrive.

That worked, when we had newspapers that were funded, where the media landscape was not consolidated, and where we didn’t have an abundance of technology that overwhelmed our ability to verify and be informed.

Today, through entirely private forces, we can monopolize, fracture and shape the traffic in our marketplace of ideas.

Trump is very much the ideal candidate to ride the media environment. The right side of the political spectrum is simply a far more efficient at providing a wrestling style experience for its audience. Its consolidated media environment largely pays lip service to journalistic standards, and sells a coordinated set of ideas for its audience.

The Fox News effect is a case in point, and this was from the 90s.

This media model has been co-opted globally, with every party and government now providing patronage to media houses to keep them afloat, and to build their own narratives.

The citizen who engages in these media markets simply does not enter a vibrant competitive market anymore.