[xorvoid]

"The person seems to have low self-esteem, displays introversion, poor honesty, low emotional stability, very little adventurousness and poor self-control hence we can target them with both niche and common products and services."

Amusing to me how wrong this is... I don't know how you can determine such characteriatics from a photo in any direction. I will admit that my appearance though tends to throw mixed and incorrect signals (not an accident). I find the entire concept of appearance signaling pretty off-putting so I guess this is a great result.

The only thing Google Lens has succeeded at for me is age, race, and location. Basically everything else has been very wrong.

[rTX5CMRXIfFG]

The point isn't to get it right. It's about what people with more power and capital than you will do when the AI makes the wrong inferences about you.

[xorvoid]

Maybe you need to spell out what you're implying because it's not very clear. I don't understand what's so bad about wrong inferences. I've been living with wrong inferences my whole life - it's usually others that are made the fool.

In this particular case it means that you end up with really bad ad targeting. I'm happy with that, it's much easier to dismiss and roll your eyes at scam junk ads than ones that actually know how to manipulate you...

[dontfeedthemac]

this