| > Iran has murdered over 30,000 of its own citizens for peacefully protesting. The US has not done that, nor have we "shot down" our citizens. Yet the US has been an accomplice to that, by intentionally destabilizing the country and then arming its population. And then murdering children. > Yes, this is in response to the Iranian regime's attempts to hold global trade hostage for their own benefit and enrichment - i.e. if you pay the regime ransom money you can purchase oil, but that is not acceptable so we will not allow it. Unfortunately, the United States yet again has to bail out the rest of the world. "You" won't allow it? You were the ones who started a war with a country for your own nefarious interests, then destabilized world commerce, then asked the rest of the world to fix your own fuckup, and you have the gall of "not allowing" something? You should go sit in a corner and stop putting all of us in distress. Regarding "bailing out," trying to fix your fuckups by throwing even more fuel on the fire is not bailing out. > Nuclear weapons are dangerous, for sure. That's why Iran can't be allowed to posses one. And that's why a trigger-happy, deranged nation shouldn't be allowed to possess them either. > Usually every four years we select a new President. Every 2 years we hold elections and usually we select new Senators or members of the House of Representatives. Iranians, unfortunately, just live under a brutal military dictatorship without the possibility of regime change despite their ever-increasing desire and need. Your "elections" are a mockery where an entire nation is funneled into choosing between two parties that agree on everything that matters. You are given the choice between Dumb and Dumber. |
So we've reached the point where the Iranian government giving an order to IRGC troops to pick up machine guns, aim them at peaceful protestors, and then fire and kill over 30,000 people is the US's fault?
Thanks, Obama, I guess?