|
|
|
|
|
by onli
4970 days ago
|
|
Thanks for trying to make that constructive :) Though you probably didn't want to answer my comment, but the one above: Sure think that this is the way to go, either being able to sort the library accordingly, or better by something like your intelligent queuing algorithm. But the suggestion i objected was to have this as the default-sort-setting of the library. |
|