[ViewTrick1002]

Tiring with arbitrary limitations to exclude major accidents of a fleet in the hundreds.

The difference between renewables and nuclear power is who gets harmed.

When dealing with nuclear accidents entire populations are forced into life changing evacuations, if all goes well.

For renewables the only harm that comes are for the people who has chosen to work in the industry. And the workplace hazards are the same as any other industry working with heavy things and electric equipment.

[belorn]

> For renewables the only harm that comes are for the people who has chosen to work in the industry.

We are definitively not including hydro power and their dam projects in that category.

[ViewTrick1002]

On a whole hydro has saved lives due to managing rivers which previously caused devastating floods.

The reason a ton of dams exists is not to make power, it is manage the river. Making power is a secondary concern.

But when we’re done with climate change we should of course restore as many rivers as possible due to the ecosystem damage they cause.

[mpweiher]

On the whole, nuclear power has saved many more lives, over 1.8 million up to 2011.

https://www.giss.nasa.gov/pubs/abs/kh05000e.html

And the worst power-production disaster in history so far was neither Fukushima nor Chernobyl, but the 1975 Banqiao Dam failure. And it's not even close.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975_Banqiao_Dam_failure

[AnthonyMouse]

> When dealing with nuclear accidents entire populations are forced into life changing evacuations, if all goes well.

There have been multiple nuclear accidents in the US:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_reactor_accidents_in_t...

Which of them resulted in "entire populations [] forced into life changing evacuations"? Which ones were the implied something worse than that and what happened then?

> For renewables the only harm that comes are for the people who has chosen to work in the industry.

Solar panels are essentially semiconductors. "Silicon valley" is called that because they used to actually make such things there. You can tell from the number of superfund sites.

"The newer ones are safer" has a certain symmetry to it, right?

> And the workplace hazards are the same as any other industry working with heavy things and electric equipment.

Those things are actually the dangerous things though? There were no fatalities from Three Mile Island but a plant worker at a nuclear power plant in Arkansas was killed and several others injured when a crane collapsed and a generator fell on them. Power company line workers have a worse-than-average fatality rate from getting electrocuted.