[next_xibalba]

Meanwhile, the other side is just openly calling for the horrible deaths of people who disagree with them. So, I can choose the 1) openly homicidal fascist, or 2) the maybe fascist (so you say) who is not openly homicidal.

So, I'm gonna go ahead and side with the people who aren't openly homicidal.

[pesus]

You should side with the people that aren't homicidal, not the ones that are polite and closeted about it.

But also, homicidal is doing some heavy lifting here, isn't it? It may be accurate in this case, but someone saying we should go kill all the Nazis in WW2 because they're actively genociding their people would also fall under that umbrella.

[luckylion]

> But also, homicidal is doing some heavy lifting here, isn't it?

Yeah, wishing someone's family to be chopped to pieces isn't actually homicidal.

While saying no such thing and not acting in such a way that suggests as much is deeply suspicious because that's just being "polite and closeted about it". And thus the totally not homicidal brutal-murder-liking-people who are absolutely not wishing death and destruction on people not sharing their ideology are the ones to support. because the others are fascists, because they don't say they want the families of others murdered.