[t23414321]

( Let's stop AI crimes ..)

It looks like AI generated code can't be used legally - without respecting rights and licenses or without proving that no copyrighted code may happen to be mixed in - true only if no such was used to learn at first - what all we know, it's not the case: all is tainted by legal omissions or simply: stolen (prove otherwise - there is nothing AI invented first except hallucinations).

AI generated works can't be copyrighted as for now - but original works eaten by AI shall not be decopyrighted neither !

Then, just by preserving all attributions of pieces mixed into the answers it would be possible to distinguish what was hallucinated and slope, what was not - and what was stolen, what was not - and who is responsible for what (?)

- inconvenient ?? - to expensive ??? - Duh.

If no more AI slopes and no rights be broken - it's worth it,

- without that ? - it will be distrusted, illegal and terminal.

[t23414321]

Related: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645976 AI that copied musical artist files copyright claim against artist

>The fact the songs are AI is meaningless. She had songs. Someone else created a cover of the songs, claimed them as original, and distributed them. They get ISRC numbers and auto sync copyright claims through distribution. She needs to file suit against the claimants. The end. ?