|
|
|
|
|
by Geniuzz
68 days ago
|
|
I don’t understand the negative sentiment here. What’s the problem? Do you think less money should be going into VC? Just some numbers ~1.5M housing units are built in the US with an approx cost of $300k - $400k. That is $450B to $600B going into housing units construction every year. On the other hand VC has maybe $1T AUM in the US. Maybe 10%-20% of that is deployed every year? So $100b to $200B. What is wrong with that ratio? Could there be better solutions to make more housing cheaper? (lower regulations, efficient permitting, etc) Money moving from VC to housing seems without a first principled approach on what problem your solving and how is silly. |
|