Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by GeneralMayhem 69 days ago
Right, but the impressive part is finding addresses that are actually on different memory channels.
1 comments

Surprising to me that two memory channels are separated by as little as 256 bytes. The short distance makes it easier to find, surely?
Access optimization or interleaving at a lower level than linearly mapping DIMMs and channels. x86 cache lane size is 64 bytes, so it must be a multiple. Probably 64*2^n bytes.