Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by roncinephile 65 days ago
if you're a political action group then voluntarily choosing to limit the eyeballs on the ideas you're trying to espouse seems so counterproductive and antithetical for your raison d'ĂȘtre that it's hard not to look at this as shooting oneself in the foot. The PR person who thought this up is doing more harm than good. There's no way the metrics will improve because of this decision.
1 comments

So should they make a Truth Social account too? Should they be posting on 4chan? Do they need to take out AM radio ads to really make sure they're reaching everyone?

Or maybe they can just use their limited resources on places where their efforts are working.

>So should they make a Truth Social account too?

Yes! urgently! Why wouldn't they? That's where (I assume) the most opposing people are. That should be the most important outreach. If they can get one person (from what I assume) is their most distant idealogue, then who couldn't they convince?

Disclaimer: I've literally never once used truth social.