[evanjrowley]

>But docker

Maybe one day! One of the things that has changed in the past 20 years with FreeBSD is the addition of bhyve. Virtualization on FreeBSD was not great prior to bhyve. Because FreeBSD waited to implement it, they ended up with an arguably more modern hypervisor versus what Linux had at the time. Maybe history will repeat when it comes to application containers / docker images. Podman came 5 years after Docker and the result was better. It could happen with FreeBSD too.

[robot-wrangler]

Wow, searched this thread for docker hoping to realize I was behind the times and thinking surely it must work by now. It's so crazy that the BSDs have a reputation for stable, implying sysadmins and servers, then it won't support the one thing that every server needs. VMs running linux is the preferred path of least resistance then? Honestly you'd have to work hard to find a better way to alienate your target audience.

[Gud]

Jails is far superior to the kludge that is docker. “Every server” only needs docker if you’re asking the wrong questions

[robot-wrangler]

I'm sure it will be a great comfort to the last person left who knows what a jail is

[Gud]

I believe FreeBSD will make a comeback on the server. But you do you.