|
|
|
|
|
by JumpCrisscross
77 days ago
|
|
Thank you. I guess there is wiggle room on which ten points he believes “is a workable basis on which to negotiate.” > Ghalibaf's statement mentions three of the specific points he views the US as breaking Well, sure. We shouldn’t have drones over Iran. Israel shouldn’t be bombing Hezbollah. And Iran probably shouldn’t be bombing Saudi Arabia or restricting transit through the Strait. That said, both sides are being disingenuous. If there are terms, publish them. If there is only a framework, there is nothing to break. |
|
Edit: I notice now that you didn't fail to understand this distinction in the very next sentence, but that wasn't about Israel...