|
|
|
|
|
by lxgr
78 days ago
|
|
I have my doubts about short and medium term feasibility, and much more importantly storage and adapting carbon-based industrial processes. But yes, if all it took was 5% of landmass (which also doesn’t get permanently unusable nor polluted), I’d say that would be a pretty good deal, yeah. This is significantly less than what’s used for livestock farming, to put it into perspective. Realistically, I don’t think we’ll solve storage fast enough to be able to afford zero nuclear power in Europe. |
|