Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by LoganDark 70 days ago
I have never seen any situation where this is not already necessary other than UPnP which already almost never works reliably. A publicly-addressable relay is already practically non-negotiable for anything over the internet.
3 comments

IPv6 everywhere makes that not necessary, which is what the author is pushing for.
Without NAT, it wouldn't be. That's the point.
uPnP works fine though? What was the problem you had with it?
For one, monopolies disabling it by default on their equipment? I remember some years ago having to guess the admin password at a vacation house so I could enable UPnP. It's usually framed as a security vulnerability, even.
uPnP fails when multiple devices are fighting over the same port assignments. uPnP fails when people have it disabled, as has been recommended many times over the years.