Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by squibonpig 74 days ago
Asymmetric warfare shouldn't be measured on the metrics of conventional warfare. Iran can continue to cause enormous economic pain for the world without any of that.
2 comments

Agree with same comment as above.

> This is true. 90% destruction of military is meaningless if 10% can wreck havoc on the strait. The cost associated with eliminating that 10% was deemed too much. That is Iran’s “win”.

But we can eliminate 90% of senior leadership at any time. How do they measure that cost?
One facet of guerilla element asymmetric warfare is to just do without that whole reliance on hierachy.
You arguably can't run gorilla large-scale manufacturing. There are obvious limits to what you can achieve when the opposition can run decapitation strikes every few months.
China and russia can. And they can send that shit to iran through pakistan and the caspian

You gotta bet china and russia loved what happened here

lol no, they both have lost substantial influence in Iran... the US has been chipping away at the spheres of influence for both China and Russia in recent months, first with Venezuela and now Iran. Hopefully Cuba is next.

And the US surveillance capabilities are substantially greater than they were during the Iraq and Vietnam wars. Smuggling in drones or missiles isn't some trivial affair.

And again, if they do that, we just decapitate their leadership again. And again. Until they stop.

and now you're into mesh logistics and distributed supply from outside backers in interesting terrain with long borders.
Irrelevant if you can keep doing decapitation strikes on leadership.
> Iran can continue to cause enormous economic pain for the world without any of that.

should every non-Western country be subsidizing all consumer fuel costs?

I don't understand the question