Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by stinkbeetle 75 days ago
Yes yes that was exactly the same thing said 20, 30, and probably 40 and 50 years ago too. Was wrong then too.
1 comments

No, it wasn’t. In 2008, I went to a lecture by a professor researching better PV cells, and it was, “here’s the benchmarks solar needs to beat to be cost competitive with nuclear, let alone oil or natural gas. As you can see, we’re nowhere close, but here’s what concepts we think can get us there.”

Meanwhile, nuclear’s appeal is that it can scale incredibly well. It’s not cost competitive with oil or gas, and certainly not with solar, but it can put out a ton of energy. With the sudden need for more and more data centers, there’s now a market for that. But solar is cheaper, safer, and is ready to go now.

Yes it was. I didn't say everybody said that, but the anti-nuclear / pro-carbon luddites sure did.