[rubslopes]

> Humans aren't benefiting from LLMs, only a few individuals are.

Honest question: how is this different from traditional Open Source? Linux powers most of the internet, yet the biggest beneficiaries are cloud providers, not individual users. Good open weights models already exist and people can run them locally. The gap between "open" and "everyone benefits equally" has always been there...

[watwut]

Because opposite is true for open source? It is actually for free, whether you contribute to it or not. Anyone can legally use it for free. Torwalds can not just wake up one day and decide to charge more.

If you feel like linux is a too much of a monopoly, you can actually fork it and compete.

[rubslopes]

But I considered that when I said "Good open weights models already exist and people can run them locally."

You can have a great LLM model with vast coding knowledge running on your computer right now, for free. It won't be the best one nor the fastest one, but still a very good one.

[TeMPOraL]

Same is true about science as well. Taxpayer money is spent on research, but the outcomes of that research primarily benefits the corporate interests.

I'm the last person to cheer for unrestrained capitalism, but this anti-billionaire / anti-AI narrative is getting ridiculous even for general population standards, much less for HN. It's like people think their food or medicine or LLMs grow on fucking trees. No. Companies and corporations is how adults do stuff for other adults, at scale. Everyone understands that, except of a part of software industry, that by accidental confluence of factors, works by different rules than literally the rest of the world.