[CyberDildonics]

I think my point still stands. I think the point still stands

I'm not sure what point you are making, it seems like you're just describing a gold backed currency and repeating the same things multiple times.

If you aren't using gold directly how would there ever be "not enough" unless a penny became worth too much? People did this for hundreds of years, this isn't some theory or experiment, it's basically how the world worked for most of human history.

[RealityVoid]

> If you aren't using gold directly how would there ever be "not enough" unless a penny became worth too much?

If you peg an amount of money to a mass of gold, would you or would you not limit the amount of money in existence?

[CyberDildonics]

It worked before, you do know money is divisible right?

There is already a quantifiable amount of money in existence, can we at least establish that?