|
|
|
|
|
|
by xmcqdpt2
68 days ago
|
|
|
I'm sure some human writers would write: > The specification forces this question on every path through the IMU mode-switching code. A reviewer examining BADEND would see correct, complete cleanup for every resource BADEND was designed to handle. > The specification approaches from the other direction: starting from LGYRO and asking whether any paths fail to clear it. > *Tests verify the code as written; a behavioural specification asks what the code is for.* However this is a blog post about using Claude for XYZ, from an AI company whose tagline is "AI-assisted engineering that unlocks your organization's potential" Do you really think they spent the time required to actually write a good article by hand? My guess is that they are unlocking their own organizations potential by having Claude writes the posts. |
|
|
Given I'm familiar with Juxt since before, used plenty of their Clojure libraries in the past and hanged out with people from Juxt even before LLMs were a thing, yes, I do think they could have spent the time required to both research and write articles like these. Again, won't claim for sure I know how they wrote this specific article, but I'm familiar with Juxt enough to feel relatively confident they could write it.
Juxt is more of a consultancy shop than "AI company", not sure where you got that from, guess their landing page isn't 100% clear what they actually does, but they're at least prominent in the Clojure ecosystem and has been for a decade if not more.