|
|
|
|
|
|
by lan321
69 days ago
|
|
|
Time/working hours and pay. It'd be nice to have a company with only CTO-level engineers, but no one can afford that or even find enough workers at a certain scale, regardless of pay. It makes sense that with AI, you can have architects who haven't written code in 5 years produce acceptable code, but I don't know many people high up the chain who'd say they have the time or desire for that. Until your level's backlog is empty, you'll always find something better to do than the tasks of your lower-level colleagues, and it'll never become empty. |
|
|
The point I was trying to make is that, if AI is accurate for Engineering work, why do we think its not accurate for PM job, if it is accurate for PM job, then it should be accurate for others as well.
Subsequently, it makes agent swarms accurate.
So you will have 1 CEO talking and creating the product, then expose another channel to customers where customer agents talk to the company agent.
Problem is, AI is not accurate and problems accumulate, this is why you need engineers, same applies to PMs, if you solely rely on AI writing product docs, mistakes accumulate and your engineers will build totally different product