|
|
|
|
|
|
by jrandolf
80 days ago
|
|
|
You're right that we're less flexible than OpenRouter or Chutes. We don't let you hop between models per-request. If you want that, use those. If you want predictable cost and guaranteed throughput on one model, that's us. On TEE: yeah, it's stronger, but it also adds cost and latency. We run dedicated hardware with no prompt logging and an isolated proxy. For most people who just don't want their data in someone's training set, that's enough. If your threat model is more serious than that, we're not the right choice. On models: we are focusing on Qwen for now. We add based on demand. Would you actually use MiMo-V2-Pro or Trinity if we had them? |
|
|