[mkeeter]

The review is also heavily LLM-inflected, to the point of being distracting.

GPTZero gives it a 100% chance of being AI generated, and I've found that these tools may give false negatives from a well-prompted model, but false positives are rare.

If you are looking to tune your intuition for AI-written text, here's an interesting list of their quirks (ironically provided as a Claude skill for removing those quirks from emitted text):

https://github.com/stephenturner/skill-deslop/blob/main/refe...

[geoffschmidt]

I'm not so sure about false positives being rare.. ZeroGPT flags the Gettysburg Address as 96% AI generated:

https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtificialInteligence/comments/1s0y...

(I tried it just now and got the same result as in that post)

[jasomill]

According to that site, Robert Kennedy's speech on the night Martin Luther King was killed[1] was almost entirely the product of GenAI, as were both of Obama's inaugural addresses[1][2].

By this logic, I'd venture a guess that "AI" was also responsible for some of Shakespeare's most famous lines.

[1] https://www.jfklibrary.org/learn/about-jfk/the-kennedy-famil...

[2] https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/realitycheck/the_press_...

[3] https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2013/0...

[mkeeter]

Fair enough, I accept "the blog post was written by someone from the 1800s" as an alternative hypothesis.

edit: For what it's worth, I also just tested the Gettysburg Address (using the "Bliss Copy" from [1]), and got a "100% Human" score.

[1] https://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/gettys...