[pixl97]

While those listed papers may not be outright fabrications, they are very much manipulated by what their billionaire owners want you to know.

Part of the problem here is you can only list a few papers that might tell you the truth at all, when in the past there was far more independent news organizations that would vie against each other. Now they need to check in with their shareholders first.

[suzzer99]

Every WaPo reporter and editor doesn't check in with Bezos before a story goes to print. Yeah, the owners steer some stuff and kill some articles, but for the most part there's still very good reporting going on at the major US papers. It's a convenient fallacy to handwave away all established journalism because billionaire owners are chipping away around the edges.

[pixl97]

>WaPo reporter and editor doesn't check in with Bezos before a story goes to print.

Reporters are at the bottom of the list, there is a pile of middle and upper management that does all this work for Bezos without his need to keep an eye on it.

All it takes is one phone call from him saying they need to be careful around a topic and that's it. Funds dry up for investigations into that topic.

Now, I never said 'throw away' journalism, I said to ensure you understand the bias of the paper in question. Just because WaPo isn't reporting on Bezos doesn't mean there isn't anything to report on said guy.

[chasd00]

late checking in on the conversation. I agree with you to a degree but it's better than the rage bait online. Also, with a physical piece of paper you can reach the end, it doesn't scroll forever. I was subscribed to the paper wsj for a while and that was my favorite part, i could reach the end.