[gonehome]

Why jump to something else that's illegal?

I would suspect with legalization the cartels would have an advantage as a legal drug seller since they already have the distribution network and systems in place.

There would also be less need for violence with the ability to take people to court for breaking contractual deals.

[DanBC]

> Why jump to something else that's illegal?

It's going to be difficult for many members of criminal gangs to move into mainstream employment. Violent murderers probably don't make great employees.

It's a shame that the less violent low-level offenders will also find it hard to escape the life of crime, and it'd be great if there was some Mexican legal cannabis co-operative that rehabilitated gang members.

The cartels don't have a distribution network that would scale to legal distribution. Catapulting bales of cannabis over the border isn't useful for legal businesses.

While their networks aren't much use for a legal business they are useful for more illegal business. People trafficking is a high profit business. Gun running is high profit business. Other drugs - heroin, cocaine, amphetamines, are all still illegal and unlikely to become legal any time soon.

[chrischen]

It's clearly pushing them into a less optimal corner. If it were more optimal, they'd be doing it right now anyways.

[loeg]

Right, it's likely they're already in those markets (harder drugs, etc) in some way and are saturated: they can't pump more money out of them. Taking away marijuana revenue takes away a fixed amount of their income.

[ryanmolden]

Cartels make far more money off "hard drugs" than they do off marijuana, and smuggling hard drugs is easier just due to size (a kilo of cocaine is tiny compared to a kilo of marijuana) and relative lack of tell-tale signs like odors (dogs can sniff out packaged cocaine and meth, humans can sniff out packaged marijuana). I served on a grand jury a couple of years ago and a DEA agent, testifying in a big meth smuggling indictment, said the local authorities had cracked down so efficiently on small, local meth labs that it opened a big door for cartels to become the suppliers. Violence and volume rose rather immediately. I think legalizing marijuana is probably a good step, and it will take >0 dollars from cartels, but I highly doubt it would be a serious impediment to them, the will continue with other drugs, local (to Mexico) activities like kidnapping and extortion, and branching out into other organized crime activities (fraud, loansharking, etc...)

[chrischen]

Where are you sources?

The article says this:

"That makes it almost as important to their business as the cocaine trade, which is worth about $2.4 billion."

[grannyg00se]

"Why jump to something else that's illegal?"

Because it's the prohibition that causes the absurd profit margins they are accustomed to. It's unlikely that they would accept an average profiting legal product rather than go after the next absurdly profitable illegal product. Also, their entire business is based around providing a prohibited product. They wouldn't likely be keen to completely change business models.

[tehayj]

The market will get much smaller for people who want to sell cannabis because lots of consumers will grow it themselves.

Many cannabis dealer will also try to start larger growing operations. Same thing happened in the Netherlands.

[Adirael]

Just this. It's called weed for something. Sure, growing high grade stuff it's expensive and hard, but that's not what most people are consuming anyway.

[dwiel]

Actually, growing your own is still illegal in Washington. Colorado limits each person to 6 plants. Will be interesting to see how the difference effects the markets.

[loeg]

Actually, if either of these conditions are met, it's legal to grow in Washington:

  * Medical cannabis patient (limited to some small number of plants, like CO), or
  * State-licensed grower under I-502

[jQueryIsAwesome]

Is a likely possibility; but there its not a sure thing; remember that after the end of the alcohol prohibition in the USA the crime rate did dropped[0]. Also, the jobs opportunities that legalization creates may help this become the case.

[0]http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/alcohol-pro...

[jeffool]

I get you. If I were a drug dealer or bootlegger, I'd be holding out for legalization also. But, and I may be completely wrong, let's think it out. Look at who you're employing. Likely school dropouts who have been taught violence is the appropriate counter-measure to problems. You've got a few notorious crews, a distribution network that knows how to void police, and many street level people.

Now, I'm changing my outfit the second it goes legit. I'm in storefronts, I've got catchy packaging, I've got customer incentive programs, and everyone will know my website and Twitter.

So, now that I'm shipping UPS and insuring your product, what happens to my former crew? The hardcore bunch that did my killing? The street gangs? The people who escaped police? They're the ones looking for a new grind. They're schooled in the ways of the evading cops, killing, and terror tactics. They're going to use the tools they have to make money. They may even be angry at their former employers who are now legitimately wealthy. And seeing how popular kidnapping has become in South America? No reason it couldn't catch on in Mexico as well, given the right circumstances.

[hso9791]

The thugs would be ratting the drug lords out all over the place to get plea bargains.

The biggest winner in the war on drugs are criminal enterprises, just because of the profit margins. These are agricultural products that anyone could produce given some soil and modest investments. How could this sustain the lavish lifestyles the top of the cartels have gotten used to?

[jlarocco]

I'm not sure if you're serious, but there are a few problems with that.

First, there's a lot of crime that goes along with running a cartel. Selling marijuana may be legalized, but most of the cartel people have long criminal histories that aren't going away. Murder, torture, bribery, kidnapping and all that are still crimes.

Second, a good deal of a drug cartel's infrastructure is devoted to violence and smuggling. Obviously violence can't be part of a legitimate business. And unless they're trying to evade taxes, the smuggling stuff is just overhead compared to other shipping methods.