[rincebrain]

As far as I can see, no, the author disabled nothing of the sort that he documented.

I suspect that the author's intent is less "I do not view this as a bug" and more "I do not think it's useful to get into angry debates over whether something is a bug". I do not know whether this is a common thing on btrfs discussions, but I have certainly seen debates to that effect elsewhere.

(My personal favorite remains "it's not a data loss bug if someone could technically theoretically write something to recover the data". Perhaps, technically, that's true, but if nobody is writing such a tool, nobody is going to care about the semantics there.)

[yjftsjthsd-h]

> I suspect that the author's intent is less "I do not view this as a bug" and more "I do not think it's useful to get into angry debates over whether something is a bug".

Agreed, and I appreciate the attempt to channel things into a productive conversation.