[hamasho]

AI-generated content should have the same amount of copyright as prompt texts. You can't claim copyright for the text "Rock music with angry vocals and 160 bpm with a guitar solo".

But I think training models using copyrighted content is stealing in the first place. It's not fair use, so it should be banned entirely.

[ceejayoz]

> AI-generated content should have the same amount of copyright as prompt texts.

That's about right currently.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-de...

"Plaintiff Stephen Thaler had appealed to the justices after lower courts upheld a U.S. Copyright Office decision that the AI-crafted visual art at issue in the case was ineligible for copyright protection because it did not have a human creator."

[hperrin]

I have great news for you.

It has even less copyright. A prompt text you write, if sufficiently creative enough, is copyrighted. The output of an AI, no matter how “creative”, is always pubic domain.

https://sciactive.com/human-contribution-policy/#More-Inform...

[userbinator]

pubic domain.

Only certain types of AI output.

[hperrin]

All large language model output, unless it is infringing someone else’s copyright, is public domain. Did you read the quotes from the copyright office I linked to?