[skeeter2020]

I think the tech world is fundamentally difference, though I'm not old enough to experience it in '69. I don't believe we had tech moguls who built enormous wealth and realized they could by the influence they couldn't muster with social influence, and that has made the world net-worse.

[Gagarin1917]

What’s the point of focusing on one aspect of the world?

Taken as a whole, the 60’s were far more intense and violent. The Vietnam War. The draft. The Cuban Missile Crisis. Racial inequality and protests. Several major assassinations. Nixon in the White House. And that’s just the US.

The world is net-better even if certain areas still need improvement. But there’s really no point to hyperfocusing on just the things that are worse.

[whimsicalism]

I find it odd how reluctant you are to say it is more just today. I think it is no comparison.

[bostik]

> I don't believe we had tech moguls who built enormous wealth and realized they could by the influence

Didn't this just describe the robber barons of the Gilded Age? Moguls and oligarchs of the day, yes. Amassed their fortunes on the emerging frontier technology of the time, I'd say so. Wielded enormous power over political discourse and essentially owned the law makers of the day. Rhymes, for sure.

It doesn't really matter whether you live in a democracy if the the very issues that are even allowed to be voted on are decided by an elite, wealthy and politically connected group.