[bigyabai]

No, please continue. What artifacts have you accumulated, what multidimensional quantum stories do you have to tell? It must all be so exciting.

If we're going to lie about reality while eschewing accountability, we might as well make it fun.

[uncanny2]

I do have a bunch of stuff, though the economy of brevity is really the only way.

I may be wrong, misled, or “crazy”, though I am a man of truth and integrity and put myself considerably at risk accusing your ruling class of treason against humanity.

I hope you’ve read my threads. There is more spread throughout other accounts (truth is not as popular as mob appetites proclaim.) and more to come!

The qubit is a dead end, true quantum computing and a better understanding of consciousness will come through quantum holography, which is decades away.

I have a revised information theory, which states thermodynamics is a footnote of entropy rather than the other way around. And the definition of entropy (suiting information and physics) is “the existential phenomenon of potential distributing over the surface area of negative potential.

I think you will find that drops right in to the useful applications of existing frameworks (without defining a new “kind” of entropy for every additional potential or distribution or surface area.)

It isn’t that “everyone is wrong” it is that the story we tell ourselves is incorrect. It’s those “theorists” you have to watch out for, the engineers (pragmatists) had it right (application wise) all along.