|
|
|
|
|
|
by heavyset_go
77 days ago
|
|
|
An earlier attempt at registering AI creations without AI attribution was rejected by the Copyright Office[1], saying that person in particular needed to make an AI attribution, which they were originally not doing. In this case, the court is saying AI attribution is not okay, either. There is no way to register copyrights for AI creations. It's consistent with the Copyright Office's interpretation of copyright law where it holds that it only applies to human creations and doesn't apply to non-human creations, which is what they say AI creations fall under: > The Copyright Office affirms that existing principles of copyright law are flexible enough to apply to this new technology, as they have applied to technological innovations in the past. It concludes that the outputs of generative AI can be protected by copyright only where a human author has determined sufficient expressive elements. This can include situations where a human-authored work is perceptible in an AI output, or a human makes creative arrangements or modifications of the output, but not the mere provision of prompts. [1] https://www.copyright.gov/rulings-filings/review-board/docs/... [2] https://newsroom.loc.gov/news/copyright-office-releases-part... |
|
|