|
|
|
|
|
by MattGaiser
70 days ago
|
|
> I have no reason to expect this technology can succeed at the same level in law, medicine, or any other highly human, highly subjective occupation. I mean, if anything, I would expect it to help bring structure to medicine, which is an often sloppy profession killing somewhere between tens of thousands and hundreds of thousands of people a year through mistakes and out of date practices. As medicine is currently very subjective. As a scientific field in the realm of physical sciences, it shouldn't be. |
|
Just basic stuff like smart dictation that listens to the conversation the practitioner is having and auto creates the medical notes, letters, prescriptions etc saving them time and effort to type that all up themselves etc. They were saying that obviously they have to check everything but it was (and I quote) "scarily perfectly accurate". Freeing up a bunch of their time to actually be with the patient and not have to spend time typing etc.