[mark_l_watson]

Interesting, and not quite my experience. While I do get better agentic coding results for Python projects, I also get good results working with Common Lisp projects. I do have a habit of opening an Emacs buffer and writing a huge prompt with documentation details, sometimes sample code in other languages or if I am hitting APIs I add a working CURL example. For Common Lisp my initial prompts are often huge, but I find thinking about a problem and prompt creation to be fun.

The article mentions a REPL skill. I don’t do that: letting model+tools run sbcl is sufficient.

[jimlikeslimes]

Yes, I've also found llms can generate working common lisp code quite well, albeit I've only been solving simple problems.

I haven't tried integrating it into a repl or even command line tools though. The llm can't experience the benefit of a repl so it makes sense it struggled with it and preferred feeing entire programs into sbcl each time.