[Multiplayer]

Big Giant Million Dollar Question: Where does having Openclaw using Claude Code via ACP fall? It's using the Claude Code harness, not the model directly.

If you are not aware, ACP creates a persistent session for steering rather than using the models directly.

[nextaccountic]

The Zed ACP client for example is still controlled by the human prompt, and they will probably not be banned

[Aperocky]

I have no idea what ACP offers that are superior to a tmux session. With tmux, you can attach to it at any time, send keys at any time, and capture pane without bothering any running process inside.

And you don't have to get anyone's permission to use tmux.

[gck1]

> And you don't have to get anyone's permission to use tmux.

I'm not so sure about that. I have my own local multi agent orchestration setup with tmux and native claude code, codex, and gemini. They can talk between each other using tmux.

I'm not sure precisely when does a wrapper around Claude Code become a "third party harness". If OpenCode is a third party harness, why is tmux not?

[Aperocky]

on spirit, yes. programmatically speaking, not really.

And judging by intention is a slippery slope, and they'll probably end up just banning everyone who are high usage. While some smart orchestration setup will fly under the radar (i.e. trivial to rate limit the cross tmux communication).

[bontaq]

This is my big question too. It seems by intent it's to kill it, including ACP, but I don't know.