Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by neya 82 days ago
> which is to experiment with agents

I think you completely missed the point - they built a product purely using agents and deployed it to production for others to use. Read what the product actually does first.

1 comments

Why shouldn't they ship it to production if the experiment was a success? You say the only way to code is to "learn to appropriate the correct usage of algorithms and AI" which for you is to code a generator and only use "dumb" generators to produce code, which is fine, but they just showed that for 20 bucks and a few minutes you can get very far, so their evidence is just stronger than yours.
> their evidence is just stronger than yours.

What evidence? There is 0 evidence. It's deployed to production, but that doesn't mean it works fine or is free of bugs - which is exactly my point and why you use algorithms for these types of things. They're testable, repeatable and scalable.

With LLM slop it's just that - slop.

Have you seen the code to write it off as slop?