|
|
|
|
|
|
by sdevonoes
79 days ago
|
|
|
Are devs really reviewing AI generated code? It just seems so pointless. Nobody was reviewing protoc generated code, for example, and most of my colleagues (not faang, but one level below) simply comment “LGTM!” or equivalents when a PR smells like ai generated code. Seems fair.
Even more so if I add a comment to a PR and what I get in reply is an AI generated reply with AI generated commit (you can tell also because of the “Coauthor Claude” thingy in the commit) |
|
|
Definitely. Even the current leading edge AI models (ie Claude Code Opus 4.6 (1M)) gets things (badly) wrong occasionally, makes bad decisions, and does stupid stuff.
It's a lot better than even just a few months ago, but blinding accepting its output for code that matters will catch you out.