| > I followed that topic at the time pretty in depth You apparently did not. because you are the revisionnist here. CSC (corrosion sous contrainte) is a well documented topic with accessible reports from the ASN (the french nuclear agency) [1], the court des comptes (French accounting court) and EDF itself. The source of the problem is a phenomena that affect mainly the N4 (1400MW) series of the French reactor. It has been detected in 2021, so before the 2022. Some pipe in some specific part of the circuit (secondary circuit) presented some unexpected cracks under inspection in one specific reactor. And EDF chose the stop all the potentially affected reactor and disassembly all the potentially affected pipe to scan them with X ray and triple check that the corrosion phenomena is not widespread. Where they over-reacted, is that they also disassembled the different serie 900Mw reactor 'just in case', at the worst time.... meaning right before Vladmir Putin attacked Ukrain. > If it was just "an overreaction" there would've been tremendous political pressure to just put the plants back online Sure. They should have just emergency duck tape the pipe without following any safety protocol, in a nuclear installation, just to please some politicians and because Putin dreamed of cold war again #sarcasm. You seem to have very little clue of about the nuclear industry internals and its associated safety processes.... It of course took time. The only thing you are correct on is that, indeed, it took longer than expected and caused delays. [1]: https://recherche-expertise.asnr.fr/avis-rapports-corrosion-...
[2]: https://www.ccomptes.fr/fr/documents/68958
[3]: https://www.ladrome.fr/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/cli-csc.pd... |
[1] https://www.ina.fr/ina-eclaire-actu/president-edf-risque-fis...