|
|
|
|
|
by ericmay
85 days ago
|
|
I don't disagree with you, but just pushing back on this high-and-mighty "we let you be here" sensibility from the OP. For some reason folks seem to have become convinced the opposite way from MAGA that these bases only serve American interests which is certainly not the case. Likewise the bases also don't only serve the interest of others, they allow us to have more flexibility in our objectives and responses to issues that we see. |
|
Read
"Our government is so thoroughly rooted the US can just build whatever it pleases on our soil"
>these bases only serve American interests
Pine Gap does SFA for us. I don't think we have a need to let the US communicate with their subs through the WA antenna.
Like absolute best case we have painted a big "Nuke Here" target on the country, because we are actively a part of their nuclear communication protocols. Not to mention, this is a fact that our government intentionally hid from us for like a decade, when Pine gap was at its most contentious.
Can you quantify any benefit we have received, there's only been a single military invitation and they bailed on it.