|
|
|
|
|
by greyman
77 days ago
|
|
From a moral perspective, I would argue that this is still theft of IP, even if it's a "clean room reimplementation". The code carries valuable information about what works and what doesn't — knowledge that Anthropic had to discover through real work and iteration. It's the same as a Chinese factory duplicating a product: they skipped the entire R&D phase and saved time and money. |
|
It was taught on massive code bases that carried valuable information about what works