|
|
|
|
|
by miki123211
77 days ago
|
|
A third way of looking at it is that you can't just blindly copy arguments when the situations are clearly different. Nobody, not even Anthropic, is arguing that they should be able to host other people's paid content for free. The crux of their fair-use defense is that models are transformative works, just like parodies or book reviews, and hence should be treated as fair use. You can't just take a pile of books (no pun intended) and turn that into Claude in a day with 30 lines of Python, there's a lot of work and know-how on the Anthropic side that goes into making a good LLM. |
|
Situation A - Anthropic pays for a book - Anthropic transform the book into a new llm (transformative use) -> OK
Situation B - I pay for Anthropic API - I transform API responses into a new model (transformative use) -> Not OK
the situations, are clearly the same