[endymi0n]

Well, let's not forget the conflict of interest on the other side as well, of someone having invested decades of professional experience into a very lucrative field already getting obliterated by AI in some narrow fields.

Getting rid of radiologists is as much nonsense and saber rattling as suggesting using AI would harm patients.

The answer is clearly just the same as in software development or any other AI impacted field: Let the best professionals handle 10x+ the volume. What that means for all the rest of employees is the question of the century though...

[teeklp]

> Getting rid of radiologists is as much nonsense and saber rattling as suggesting using AI would harm patients.

Did a chatbot tell you that? What makes you think it is so?

[mountlatmus]

Well, let's not forget the conflict of interest on the other side as well, of some tech genai cuck having invested decades of professional experience into a very stochastic field where if they dupe enough hospital CEOs to harm their poor patients they may make enough money to afford to use the hospitals with real radiologists.