|
|
|
|
|
by DoctorOetker
82 days ago
|
|
I understand what you mean, but I think such a concept or definition would be highly misleading: "having no known quantum attack" means every novel encryption method would be automatically "quantum resistant" for having had 0 adversarial attempts to find quantum or even classical weaknesses! There should be some measure of competence-level-adjusted man-hours of cryptographers and mathematicians trying to swing their favorite hammers at the problem; in order to estimate this "quantum resilience". |
|
* https://mathematical-research-institute.sydney.edu.au/quantu...
* https://magma.maths.usyd.edu.au/magma/
Props to John Cannon, George Havas, Charles Leedham-Green, et al.