|
|
|
|
|
by selcuka
76 days ago
|
|
> I think it’s pretty cynical to assume that this is “good enough for most people” It's a deduction, not an assumption. Obviously it's "good enough" for "most people". Otherwise nobody would be using the free version of ChatGPT today. I pay for a Claude subscription, but even then I sometimes downgrade to Sonnet or even Haiku when I need a quick answer. |
|
I'd say it's better than nothing, which to me is not the same thing at all as "good enough".
For example, I believe most people would be better off with half the allowable queries per day, routed to a better model, but that's not an available product.