[ndriscoll]

My tools just don't add such comments. I don't know why I would care to add that information. I want my commits to be what and why, not what editor someone used. It seems like cruft to me. Why would I add noise to my data to cater to someone's neuroticism?

At least at my workplace though, it's just assumed now that you are using the tools.

[cess11]

What editor you are using has no effect on things like copyright, while software that synthesises code might.

In commercial settings you are often required to label your produce and inform about things like 'Made in China' or possible adverse effects of consumption.

[sysguest]

well if I know a specific LLM has certain tendencies (eg. some model is likely to introduce off-by-one errors), I would know what to look for in code-review

I mean, of course I would read most of the code during review, but as a human, I often skip things by mistake

[8cvor6j844qw_d6]

Tbh as long as the PR looks good, its good to go for internal testing.