|
|
|
|
|
by dghlsakjg
75 days ago
|
|
That’s a lot of words trying to reason around destroying several hundred families by liquifying their children due to negligent intel. Here’s how we handle this: fuck semantics. If your missile is targeted at and destroys a school, you should be held responsible. In fact, you can remove the school from the equation. If you aim a weapon at something, and fire the weapon, you are responsible for the outcome. If the outcome is a destroyed military base, congrats, you get credit for that. If the outcome is children being returned to their parents in closed caskets, you better believe you get the blame for that. Bad targeting data is the responsibility of those doing the targeting, not the people being targeted. We already have laws around all this. The school bombing was unequivocally a war crime. I’m not going to hear any more stupid ideas about how we can change laws to shift the responsibility for not getting obliterated by a missile onto civilians. |
|