[kergonath]

"The Russians did it as well" is not a fantastic excuse for a war crime… You might want to think this through a bit more.

[shiroiuma]

What's the problem. The Russians do stuff that you say are "war crimes", and what happens to them? Nothing. So why should anyone care if some person on the internet says these are war crimes? There's obviously no penalty against doing them, so they're not really war crimes.

[Planktonne]

Not being punished for something doesn't mean it isn't a crime, and doesn't mean it isn't wrong.

Children have a more developed sense of ethics than that.

[vharuck]

Remember that war crimes were defined to protect civilians. It's usually better for a civilian to be on the losing side in a war with no war crimes, than the winning side of a war with many war crimes.

[dygd]

> So why should anyone care if some person on the internet says these are war crimes?

Attacking civilian infrastructure is defined as a war crime by the Geneva Conventions. It's not something a person on the internet made up.

[shiroiuma]

That's all nice and well, but what exactly is the point if it's not going to be enforced *at all*? So we can feel smug and superior?