Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by kjok 78 days ago
I mean that agents can scan the code to find anything "suspicious". After all, security vendors that claim to "detect" malware in packages are relying on LLMs for detection.
1 comments

An LLM is not a suitable substitute for purpose-built SAST software in my opinion. In my experience, they are great at looking at logs, error messages, sifting through test output, and that sort of thing. But I don't think they're going to be too reliable at detecting malware via static analysis. They just aren't built for that.